ABOUT     PEOPLE     INTERVIEWS     SEMINAR     BIBLIOGRAPHY     OTHER STUFF

Curating Degree Zero Archive at the West Cork Arts Centre

 

Welcome to the Graduate School of Creative Arts & Media's - Curating Degree Zero Archive at the West Cork Art Centre project - sub-site. This site will be developed on a daily basis over the run of the project (in spring 2008 - now ended) to help frame and expand upon the discussions generated by the public presentation of a key information and research resource in respect of contemporary art practice.

The Curating Degree Zero Archive is a unique experiment in the mapping of ten years of contemporary art debates and practices. The archive will be on view and available to the public at the West Cork Art Centre (WCAC) from March 15th 2008. While the archive is open to the public there will also be audio recordings of interviews with curators and othe rcontemporary arts practitioners examining the issues raised by the construction and dissemination of the archive. There will also be a series of seminars with students, researchers and the general public over the run of the project at the WCAC.

We will begin uploading content from the first day of the run of the project at WCAC on Saturday March 15th.

Unpacking: The crates are unpacked.

 

(Bookmark this site and access audio recordings and written texts produced in response to the public presentation of the Curating Degree Zero Archive.)

 
Unpacking.

 

When invited to work with the West Cork Arts Centre on this project, I began by asking the simple question of friends and colleagues: ‘what is a curator? What does that word “curator” mean, if anything, for you?’

My assumption was that, in spite of more than a decade of expansive and widely disseminated conversations about, and among, curators, there still remains a considerable gap between professional and public understandings of what a ‘curator’ might be and what they might do as part of their working life.

Talking to Ann Davoren, the director of the West Cork Arts Centre, I formed the impression that the presentation of a set of publications (by, about, and – in a certain sense - for curators) presented more than the usual challenges of the typical exhibition of contemporary art.

The works on display would not be artworks as such – not discrete artefacts for contemplation – but complex compilations of texts, images, and recordings that documented, described, interpreted, and speculated upon a very diverse range of artworks, art projects, contemporary social cultural and political concerns and broader philosophical problems and issues at work in contemporary culture. (MW)

 

Parcels: The individual packages of curator's printed matter, CDs, DVDs, VHS tapes etc. are laid out for unwrapping.

 

So Much Stuff: The individual packs contain up to 30 items by one curator or curatorial team.

 

The Archive: Practices of Display.

 

There was a further complication then, that this wasn’t just a collection of ‘stuff’ by and about curators and the artists with whom they collaborated. This was something called an ‘archive.’

If ‘curator’ might be assumed to sound somewhat off-the-beaten track for a general audience - ‘archive’ would almost definitely sound somewhat dusty and moribund – not an especially attractive term.

It was clear that when this ‘archive’ of ‘curators’ work was presented elsewhere in Europe, the strategies adopted for exhibition tended to emphasise visual display – i.e. the published materials were assembled in gallery spaces in a stylised exhibition format that was consistent with the conventions of a gallery exhibition crossing-over with those of a museum book shop. The archive, when exhibited in the past, looked attractive, even if the word didn’t sound that way.

In discussion with the team working at the Centre, it was decided to adopt a simple strategy of informal presentation using a plain bench along the walls of the gallery supplemented by tables as necessary. Thye concern was to encourage people to feel comfortable browsing the material, picking it up, reading, and generally using the space as a reading and viewing room. (MW)

 

Making Lists: Preparing to display material, we itemised the elements in each package to check against the inventory.

 

Stopping to Read Stuff: It took a long time to itemise everything that would be on display, because we kept stopping to read things - it was hard to put down some of the texts and catalogues.

 

From Bremen to Skibbereen.

 

The basic point of departure for this project was a conference held in Bremen in 1998. The work presented in the archive has grown as the project has toured different venues and countries around Europe. There is no single common theme across the work gathered. However, there is a generalised tendency evidenced in this work which suggests that it is rooted in oppositional cultures, cultures of social and political activism, protest or commentary.

There is a strong sense in much of the material assembled here of an ethos of ‘do-it-yourself’ – DIY, sometimes referred to as ‘self-organised’ and sometimes pointing to the key role of artist-curators – artworkers who take on the role of organising, eventing and distributing their own work and that of their friends. There is also a clear move to use print media and other media forms as spaces not just for commentary on art, but as spaces for the realisation of artworks – sometimes in a precious way, sometimes in a throwaway manner.

There is something of a tension, I think, between the ephemeral – made to be used and discarded – quality of some of this material and the attempt to preserve the material in an organised collection – not just a set of ‘stuff’, but a coordinated assemblage of materials linked to ‘authors’ – in this case curator-authors – and brought together under an overarching principle of professional and social networks shared by these curator-authors.

The ‘archive’ in general has become a key idea for researchers , practitioners and writers on contemporary culture. Many artists now produce not discrete objects and images, but vast assemblages of organised information, images, objects and people, all gathered together around particular questions, ideas, propositions or contemporary points of interest, controversy or contest.

Indeed, there is the sense that exhibiting archives can become something of a cliche. As one artist, Sarah Pierce, suggests in the fanzine 'feint' (No. 3) the presentation of an 'archive as art' can sometimes be mistakenly assumed to be 'democratic and transparent and innovative.' The presumption being that when a collection of materials is presented in this way, the individual user / viewer / reader has the opportunity to make their own choices about what is and what is not important; about what should and should not be attended to. (MW)

Diverse Material: The material deals with an extraordinarily diverse range of issues from the politics of education to the self-organisation of activist communities; from new technologies to cultural policy.

Contexts: We discussed how this material might be used in the immediate local context of Skibbereen - the famous 'capital' of West Cork - a unique town with a very specific cultural mix of established and new communities; with a wide range of local cultural initiatives, organisations, clubs and societies.

Specialist and General Readership.

 

Skibbereen has been the site of previous archive-based projects. Artist, Neva Elliot, worked with the West Cork Arts Centre and the Skibereen Public Library in the late summer of 2006 on a research project called 'Archiving Skibbereen' which gathered information on groups, clubs, and societies in the area and their various activities, interests and skills.

The work that artists do, can now sometimes look like the work of an educator, a conference manager, an event organiser, a publicist, a bureaucrat, a political activist, a publisher or a social worker. This is a development that has been happening for many decades, but which has intensified in many ways in the last two decades.

Some people find these changes in contemporary art practices since the 1960s at odds with their expectations of artworks. While some people find value in individual projects without worrying too much about the overall tendencies of contemporary art. And some people attempt to interpret larger global trends in these changes in art practice – attempting to map a pattern of transformation from an emphasis on craft-based image and object production to an emphasis on professionalised organisational and ‘public intellectual’ type work patterns and attempting to produce persuasive explanations of why this is so. (MW)

 

Practices of Display: It is interesting how practices of display function in the window-spaces of the town's streets.

Unnamed Documents: Unpacking the archive also meant finding things that were unattributed to any one curator's package and simply marked as 'unnamed documents': the phraze struck me as poetic and ominous.

 
Producing Contradictions and Decisions.

 

Being a professional educator working in these areas of contemporary culture, I of course get very caught up in these discussions with my colleagues, with researchers and with students and sometimes lose sight of how far removed these concerns can be from the general run of everyday life. This is a funny contradiction to work through. Much of the changes in art working practices of recent decades have been driven by the attempt by artists, curators and others to get past the ‘high’ cultural separation of art from the world of everyday life.

Artists and curators – and by now I am hoping that you have a sense of the word ‘curator’ as a name for someone who collaborates with artists in various ways to promote the initiation, completion, distribution, discussion, and reflective encountering of all kinds of art projects from exhibitions to events to publications and so forth - these artists and curators have for many decades being pursuing many different strategies for knitting art ideas and ways of thinking into everyday life situations and processes.

Example of Archive in Practice: This is a shot of two art and design researchers from MAKHU in Utrecht, Netherlands, working on a research project into public space, practices of social exclusion / inclusion and urban regeneration. In the background there is an example of the collaborative construction of an archive as part of this type of work on public space and cultural politics.

 
Displaying the Archive.

 

At the same time, those professionally involved in art are constantly caught between this generalising tendency to engage the broadest sense of the everyday world and a specialising tendency that tries to keep in view a strong sense of the particular attitudes and histories that make up the distinctive traditions of modern art making. These contradictory pulls often lead to confused and troubled breakdowns in conversation and communication – I often find myself tripping up over my own way of speaking even as I imagine I am trying to speak plainly and for a general audience. (There are controversies, of course, over this rather clumsy notion of ‘general audience’ and related ways of speaking about ‘the public’ – we can so easily assume someone else is the public and not us.)

All these considerations are driving towards the question of how to present the material from the Curating Degree Zero Archive and how to engage specialists and generalists in conversations with each other. We probably don’t want the specialists to turn into ‘teachers’ explaining stuff or to turn the generalists into ‘pupils’ who must study from those who presume they know something ‘special.’

 
 
A Modest Proposal.

The key thing here is perhaps modesty. A modest project that is somewhat understated and it proposes some – modest – rewards for spending a little time perusing, reading, browsing through the pre-occupations of some people, who work very hard at their pre-occupations – even if they are often unsure of exactly what it is that pre-occupies them. To this end, the Graduate School of Creative Arts and Media and the West Cork Arts Centre are working together in a – modest – collaboration to explore the possibilities of contemporary art conversations in a small contemporary town in West Cork. Please join us in these conversations.

(MW - Mick Wilson, Dean of the Graduate School of Creative Arts ande Media - www.gradcam.ie - has been invited by WCAC to work on the presentation of the Curating Degree Zero Archive.)

 

 

 

Curators currently represented in the archive:

Arts Initiative Tokyo (JP)

Rosanne Altstatt (USA)

Amasté (E, Basque Country)

Artlab (UK)

Anthony Auerbach (UK)

B+B (UK)

Basekamp (USA)

Marius Babias (D)

Ute Meta Bauer (D)

Lorenzo Benedetti (ITA)

Tobias Berger (D, NZ)

Ursula Biemann (CH)

Beatrice Von Bismarck (D)

Lionel Bovier (CH)

Tim Brennan (UK)

c a l c (E)

camouflage (BE)

Ele Carpenter (UK)

Daniela Cascella (ITA)

Barbara Clausen (A)

consonni (E)

Copenhagen Free University (DK)

CRUMB (UK)

Alice Creischer & Andreas Siekmann (D)

D.A.E (E)

Catherine David (F)

Joshua Decter (A)

Clémentine Deliss (UK)

Claire Doherty (UK)

Barnaby Drabble (UK, CH)

Sergio Edelsztein (IL)

Eichelmann, Faiers & Rust (UK)

EIPCP (A)

Octavian Esanu (Mo)

Jacob Fabricius (DK)

Elena Filipovic (BE)

Fiteiro Cultural (BR, CH)

Freee (UK)

Sönke Gau (D)

David Goldenberg (UK)

Horst Griese (D)

Frederikke Hansen (DK, D)

Kent Hansen (DK)

Maria Hlavajova (NL)

Justin Hoffmann (D)

Andrew Hunt (UK)

Per Hüttner (SW, F)

K&K (D)

Christoph Keller (D)

Alexander Koch (D)

Annette Kosak (CH)

Holger Kube Ventura (D)

Kuratorisk Aktion (D/DE)

Daniel Kurjakovic (CH)

Simon Lamuniere (CH)

Kelly Large (UK)

Maria Lind (D)

Locus + (UK)

Chus Martinez (E)

Bernd Milla (D)

Elke aus dem Moore (D)

Nina Möntmann (D)

Heike Munder (CH)

Lise Nellemann (DK, D)

Tone Olaf Nielsen (DK)

Hans Ulrich Obrist (F)

Paul O'Neill (UK)

Marion von Osten (D)

Planet22 (CH)

Tadej Pogacar (SL)

Protoacademy (UK)

Catherine Queloz (CH)

Reinigungsgesellschaft (D)

RELAX (CH)

Dorothee Richter (D)

Maria Riskova (SL)

Stella Rollig (A)

Sabine Schaschl-Cooper (CH)

Annette Schindler (CH)

Katharina Schlieben (D)

Eva Schmidt (D)

Trebor Scholz (USA)

Marco Scotini (ITA)

Yukiko Shikata (JP)

Nathalie Boseul Shin (KR)

Gregory Sholette (USA)

Lisette Smits (NL)

Reinhard Storz (CH)

Bettina Steinbrügge (D)

Szuper Gallery (UK/D)

Toasting Agency (F)

TNC Network (F)

Attila Tordai (RO)

Trinity Session (SA)

Mark Tribe (USA)

Unwetter (D)

Value (CH)

Yvonne Volkart (CH)

Stevan Vukovic (SR)

Gavin Wade (UK)

Florian Waldvogel (D)

Cristine Wang (USA)

Astrid Wege (D)

Jan Van Woensel (BE)

Ina Wudtke, NEID (D)

Florian Wüst (D)

Tirdad Zolghadr (CH, IR)

Tal Ben Zvi (IL)